Belonging To God: The Church
teacher's guide Lesson 7

Lesson Seven

Jesus and His Church

Texts: Matthew 16:13-20

The purpose of this lesson: To focus on Jesus’ identity as we seek to understand his church.

 

Begin by conducting a brief review. (a) The word “church” (ekklesia) was not part of a specialized religious vocabulary that denoted a special spiritual emphasis in a Christian context.  It was a common word that referred to any number of things that included non-religious usages.  (b) The New Testament used the word to stress a concept, not an institution.  The common meaning: the “called out.”  The Christian concept: to be “in” but not to be “a part of.”  Christians are “in” this physical world, but they are governed by God’s values expressed through Jesus Christ, not by the values of those who reject God.  (c) For Christians, the word “church” should refer to people who are in Jesus Christ.  “Church” refers to the community who exist in Jesus Christ.  Acts declares “church” and people in Jesus Christ refer to the same spiritual reality.  Thus, those who are in the church are God’s called out.  We do not isolate ourselves from those who rebel against God, but live among them and seek to be a godly influence.

 

An understanding of the focus of earlier lessons is important to grasping the focus of this lesson. To fail to grasp the New Testament’s concept of the church will result in a failure to grasp the focus of this lesson.

 

The context of the text: Jesus and his disciples were in the northernmost area of Galilee.  In fact, there were more gentiles in this area than Jews.  The area was more noted for idolatrous activity than the worship of Jehovah God.  The area was north of the Sea of Galilee, acknowledged to be part of the headwaters of the Jordan River, and near Mount Hermon.

 

Jesus and his disciples were not in an area of dense Jewish population and Jewish influence at the time of this incident.

 

Jesus’ miracles and unusual teachings produced much discussion among the Jewish people.  Whatever the discussion, Jesus had to be explained.  The Jewish crowds had to explain how “this man” was able to do and say what he did and said.  For the Jewish people, the explanation centered on Jesus’ identity—his identity was the how.  Thus, Jesus asked what identity the Jewish crowds gave him.  The disciples replied that the crowds thought he was John the Baptist, Elijah, Jeremiah, or one of the prophets.  (Those were not inferior identities—the Jewish people thought Jesus was sent by God!)  Jesus then asked who the disciples thought he was.  Peter responded immediately—he was the Christ, God’s son.

 

Jesus’ acts and miracles had to be explained—whether the Jewish person was for or against Jesus and his influence.  Please note the basic reaction was a complimentary reaction.  It was an honor to be considered John the Baptist, Elijah, Jeremiah, or a prophet—though Jesus was greater than these, the comparisons were not derogatory.  Peter’s declaration said Jesus was the Messiah the Jews had long expected. The Greek word “Christ” and the Hebrew word “Messiah” refer to the same concept: God’s anointed.

 

This statement’s significance is not focused on “the church,” but on Jesus’ identity.  The emphasis is not on what he would build, but on who he was.  (1) Jesus said Peter knew who he was through revelation from God.  (2) Because of who he was, he would build his “called out.”  (3) Death would not prevent him from producing his “called out,” and death would not conquer his “called out.”  (4) Peter would play a unique role in Jesus’ producing his “called out.”  (5) The disciples should not—at this time—reveal Jesus’ actual identity as the Christ.  Saying that Jesus declared himself to be the Christ (the Jewish Messiah) at this time would not be helpful to Jesus’ ministry and mission.

 

Make certain that the students grasp the fact that the primary focus of Matthew 16:13-20 is on Jesus’ identity, not his church.

 

At this time (and before) individuals claimed to be the Christ to advance their own agenda.

 

Jesus’ agenda was much bigger than the agendas of others, and the manner in which he would serve as the Christ was in distinct contrast with the agendas of others.  He did not want to be dismissed from thought by people saying he was like anyone else.

 

Jesus’ connection to his “called out” is described as a head to a body (Jesus being the head, and those in Jesus Christ being the body) [Ephesians 1:22, 23; 4:15, 16; Colossians 1:18, 24; 2:19], and as a husband to a wife in a flawless relationship [Ephesians 5:22-32]. In each analogy, Jesus is the protector who provides guidance for his “called out.”

 

Jesus would serve the needs of his “called out.”  His church would not serve his needs—he has no needs.  His church would say thanks to him through their obedience.

 

Commonly today (and in past centuries), human emphasis tends to be on the church.  The emphasis in the first century is on the identity of Jesus as the Christ (a Greek word) or the Messiah (a Hebrew word).  God had long promised Israel a Messiah (Christ).  Israel expected a king (like David, not like Jesus) who would permanently deliver the physical nation of Israelites from foreign oppression.  Jesus simply did not fit expectations.  Jesus declared peace by surrender and joy through sacrifice and death.  Paul urged the “called out” in Rome not to seek vengeance on enemies but to show kindness to those who opposed them (Romans 12:17-21).  Israel was not an ancient nation, but the people of faith in Jesus who had been “called out” to Jesus, who entered Jesus, and who devoted themselves to God’s values (Romans 9:6-8; Galatians 3:7; 29; 6:12-16; Philippians 3:3).  Peace and joy through surrender and death?  Loving enemies?  Conquering evil by doing good?  Establishing God’s kingdom by refusing to take vengeance?  Servants who did not fight to rescue their king?  What kind of kingdom is that?  Who would want to be king of such values?  This is not at all what Abraham’s physical descendants had in mind!  Jesus, the Christ, the Messiah God promised?  An executed Savior?  A resurrected Redeemer who rejoiced in his followers’ deaths?  How was that physically any improvement over what Abraham’s physical descendants already experienced?  Thus, many in first-century physical Israel said, “No thanks!” to Jesus.  They wanted a physical king who would crush their enemies, release them from domination, and make other people fear them again!

 

The students should be able to relate to the rejecting Jews’ skepticism.  Today, people—including Christians—are so influenced by the multiple concepts of a “health and wealth gospel” that many Christian expectations tend to have more to do with what they expect than with comprehensive teachings in the Bible.

 

Christians belong to a dying man who was made Savior by God.  They conquer by doing good.  They want a King who has power over death.  Their hope is placed in Jesus’ resurrection and his promise of their resurrection.  They live in physical surrender in search of a promised body that is not physical and cannot die.  They endure the physical in anticipation of a life that cannot end when they live with an eternal God.  They understand the resurrected Jesus is Lord!  He is King!  He, by God’s acts, is the promised Christ!  They understand that they are God’s Israel!  Faith in the resurrected Jesus made them Abraham’s descendants.  God’s promises are theirs!  They exist to be Jesus’ called out!  Without the resurrected Jesus, the church and Christianity are nothing.

 

The concept of having a king is not familiar to most of us.  Having a king was very familiar to people of the first century.  Note several things about Jesus being God’s King over us.  (1) Jesus is the fulfillment of God’s promise.  (2) His position of king began after death, not ended with death.  (3) His resurrection is the foundation of our hope for our resurrection—his and ours are based on the same thing which is God’s promise.  (4) He served God’s purpose; we serve God’s purpose.  (5) His objective was to live with God; our objective is to live with God.  (6) He aspired to an existence that could not be touched by death; we, in him, aspire to an existence that cannot be touched by death.  (6) He is Lord by God’s acts; we are saved by God’s acts.  Neither of us is “self-made.”  (7) Obedient faith in Jesus makes us Israel, God’s people, those who exist by faith as did the faithful Abraham. (8) We exist as Christians to be Jesus’ “called out.”  (9) Our spiritual existence is due to what God did in Jesus Christ.

 

 

For Thought and Discussion

 

1. Give three things to be remembered in a brief review.

 

a. The word church was not part of a specialized religious vocabulary.

b. The New Testament used the word “church” to emphasize a concept, not an institution.

c. For Christians, the word “church” should refer to people who are in Jesus Christ.

 

2. What is the context of the text, Matthew 16:13-20?

 

The incident took place in a gentile region of Galilee noted for idolatry, in a region noted to be part of the headwaters for the Jordon River, and near Mount Hermon.

 

3. Jesus’ miracles and unusual teachings produced what among the Jewish people?  Why?

 

His acts and teachings produced much discussion.  Jesus’ acts and teachings demanded explanation.

 

4. Who did the Jewish people say Jesus was?  Was that a compliment?

 

Among their explanations was John the Baptist, Elijah, Jeremiah, or a prophet.  Those were compliments among the Jewish people.

 

5. Who did Peter say Jesus was?

 

Peter said Jesus was the Christ, God’s son.

 

6. The text does not focus on what, but on what?

 

The text does not focus on the church, but on Jesus’ identity.

 

7. Give a five point summary of the text (given in the lesson).

 

(1) Peter understood Jesus’ identity by God’s revelation.

(2) Jesus could build his “called out” because he was the Christ.

(3) Death could not stop him from building his “called out” and could not conquer his “called out.”

(4) Peter would pay a unique role in building the “called out.”

(5) The disciples should not reveal at that time that Jesus’ identity was that of the Christ.

 

8. Jesus connection to his “called out” is described as what two things?  In each illustration/analogy, Jesus is what two things?

 

Jesus’ connection to the “called out” is that of (a) a head to a body and (b) the ideal relationship of a husband to a wife.  Jesus is (a) the protector who (b) provides guidance.

9. Commonly today (and in past centuries), the emphasis tends to be given to what in the text?

It tends to be given to the church.

 

10. Stated in a simple statement, why was Jesus not accepted by many Jews as their Messiah?

 

Jesus failed to fit their expectations.

 

11. Many in Israel rejected Jesus because he did not do what three physical things?

 

a. Jesus did not crush their enemies.

b. Jesus did not release them from physical domination.

c. Jesus did not make other people fear the Jews again.

 

12. Why do Christians live in physical surrender and service?

 

We search for a promised non-physical body that cannot die.

 


Link to Student Guide Lesson 7

Copyright © 2009
David Chadwell & West-Ark Church of Christ

previous lesson | table of contents | next lesson