The Desire For Relevance In Society and Culture
Begin this chapter with some serious, sobering thinking. If your congregation
ceased to exist this week, would people who are not members notice? How long
would it take for people who are not members to notice? Would they notice with
the same sense of curiosity that they note a seldom-visited business ceases to
exist? "Did that business close? When? Wonder why?" Would people who were
not
members respond with no joy, no sorrow, no sense of loss, but just a "matter of
fact" observation? Or would people who are not members note the absence immediately with a sense of
alarm? Would there be an immediate flurry of questions that begin with "Who will
. . .?" Would there be an immediate sense of loss and void in much of the
community because the congregation made an obvious positive contribution to the
well-being of the community? Was the congregation such a natural part of the
communitys fabric that people in the community cannot imagine the congregation
not helping make their community a healthy place to live? Do the answers to these questions exist only in the congregations and its
leaderships minds? Do positive answers only express a self-perception based on
a sense of self-importance? Or, do the answers genuinely reflect the community's
view of the congregation? If the congregation you are part of exists by ignoring community needs, the day
may come when it ceases to exist. If that happens, the few who note its passing
will do so with indifference. If the congregation you are part of is a vibrant,
positive contributor to the communitys fabric, it is likely to exist for
generations as it continues its vibrant, positive contributions to the
communitys life. The community will be a more spiritual place because the
congregation is there. The first congregation ceases to grow and draws inward as it often fails to
convert even its own children to Gods blessings and concern. It increasingly is
characterized by "attendees" who "belong to an organization." These people
increasingly become people who major in asking questions that few ask and to
which fewer seek answers. The second congregation grows because it serves. It attracts people because its
members are alive as they teach people how to live in difficult times. They know
how to glorify God for His blessings and concern even in the worst situations. Can you imagine Jesus simply disappearing in the middle of his ministry and no
one noticing? True, he did a number of impressive deeds by using Gods power to
do the miraculous to others benefit. Also true, he taught challenging,
unexpected concepts as he discussed the fact that people must belong to God
inwardly. Many people Jesus addressed thought they had God's approval because of
ancestry with Abraham through Isaac. Consider Matthew 3:9. Some thought they had
God's approval because they did things the right way. Consider Matthew 5:21-48.
When Jesus stressed a person's inward reaction to God, he stressed something
most of them were unaccustomed to hearing or considering. In Jesus Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7, Jesus longest recorded lesson), he
focused on a concept that had not been emphasized among the majority. The
majority were influenced significantly by the Pharisees emphasis on forms and
doing things the right way. The Pharisees expressed legitimate concerns. (1) How do you keep people from
abandoning correct lessons to be learned from the past? (2) How do you protect
people from the dangerous trends of the present? Many Pharisees counteracted an
alarmed Jewish concern by emphasizing the value of maintaining contact with the
past. The old paths were their concerns focus. However, many Pharisees
stressed keeping in contact with the past through forms and procedures. The assumption: spiritual substance existed. The main thing lacking was correct
forms. Correct forms would solve the basic spiritual problems in first-century
Jewish society. That was a dangerous assumption! Spiritual substance is always threatened! Gods
spiritual objective for His people in every generation: constantly seek His
balance between spiritual substance and forms of the past to promote godly
living in an ungodly world. Thus Jesus Sermon on the Mount lesson stressed this: the key to being a
righteous person is belonging to God inwardly. Outward behavior should be an
expression of who you are instead of an affirmation that you follow correct
forms. Regardless of what form was followed, murder, failure to function as
family, adultery, divorce, lying, vengeance, and treating enemies unkindly never
demonstrated Gods valueseven if correct forms were observed (Matthew
5:21-48). It was essential that a person help the poor, pray to God, and
fastfor correct motives (Matthew 6:1-18). The objective of each was to glorify
God, not to advance self. Thus, people were to depend on God by adopting His
values. They had to want God to remake them internally.
Under Attack Christian influence (using Christian in its broadest definition) has been
under increasing attack in the American society for decades. This attack is
evident enough that people in other cultures (not noted for being religious)
have wondered why the attack. Christian perspectives are no longer valued as a
constructive influence in our society. Times have changed radically in my lifetime! When I was a teenager, families who
"went to church" nowhere expected their children to embrace and live by
Christian values in their public behavior. Protesting those values never
occurred. When a group built a church building in a community, the building (and the
coming congregation) was considered a positive happening. Often, the land was
donated. No one complained of the abuse of tax dollars if community power
structures contributed time or equipment to aid the process of building a church
building. The existence of congregations was a good thing that contributed to
the health and well-being of the community. No longer! In many schools, Christian values are not the normative values. If
Christian values are invoked or made evident, it is not unusual for one or more
children to protest. If the children do not complain, their parents do. Church buildings often must be built within proper zones. Congregations should
not assume they will be welcomed by the area in which they build buildings.
Christian values are no longer considered by some to be good things that
contribute to the health and well-being of the community. Such is the American
view today in many places. Christians can respond to this situation in one of three basic ways: they can
ignore it, they can react to it, or they can interact with it. Christian
response to this situation is a complex challenge. There is no guarantee that
response in any form will resolve the crisis quickly or change the image of
Christian believers. Christians can choose some form of ignoring, but that commonly results in
drawing inward, rejecting people, and disconnecting the congregation from the
community. The end result is that the congregation ceases to be what Jesus
intended in its existence and outreach. Some form of reacting often makes the problem (or problems) worse rather than
better. When Christians react, they invite those who oppose them to react to
their Christian reaction. The results are commonly a vicious cycle of reactions
that focus on the ever-widening gap rather than seeking a healing (ideal) or a
toleration solution (better than an open war). Jesus' "Light" Image One of the common images and illustrations Jesus used was that of light. The
concept of light dispelling darkness was not original with Jesus. For example,
God through Isaiah said that the mission of restoration was too small a mission
for Israel. God wanted Israel to be a light to the non-Jewish nations so God's
salvation would reach to the end of the earth (Isaiah 49:6). The ethics of a people ruled by God was to champion a moral behavior which
influenced people controlled by idolatry. That behavior would cause those who
lived idolatrous lifestyles to seek the living God Who forgave. Light by its nature interacts with darkness to disperse darkness. When light
interacts with darkness, darkness ceases to be in evidencethough it is always
ready to return if light is absent. Darkness is not destroyed, but dispersed. In fact, the deeper the darkness, the
more evident even a small light source becomes. Light was (and is) a symbol of
righteousness. Darkness was (and is) the symbol of wickedness. Light disperses
darkness by interacting with it, not by exerting some type of controlling,
subjugating power that destroys it. Triumph over darkness is achieved by the
superiority of lights qualities, not by an irresistible force that destroys the
darkness. Light dispels darkness by being light. The Christians influence exists by being, not by conquest. Those who control
spend a constantly increasing amount of time devoted to exercising and keeping
subjugation. Those who influence because of their being focus increasingly on
who they are in God. They concern themselves with being who they are in God
instead of forcing others to surrender to their ways. Jesus described the righteous in the Sermon on the Mount as "the light of the
world" (Matthew 5:14). Disciples existed to be an obvious light to people in
darkness. They existed to be a helpful light, not a blinding light. They did not
shine through their good works to attract attention to themselves, but to
glorify their God (Matthew 5:16). They only reflected God's light; they did not
even pretend to be the light source. Paul made the same point to the Christians
in Philippi (Philippians 2:15). First-century Christians influenced by patiently demonstrating Gods impact on
their behavior, not by exerting power and force. They interacted with society by
being controlled by God, not by being slaves to human desires. Such interaction,
at times, was a slow, costly process, but an effective process. Light is a powerful symbol! Light regulates when human activity can occur, and
when human activity cannot occur. It regulates when daily activities can begin,
and when such activities must end. Those who can afford to have convenient
artificial lighting at their disposal easily forget how necessary light is in
human activityuntil a storm destroys the power that makes lighting possible, or
until a car battery goes dead on a deserted road, or until people camping out
have no fuel to operate their lights. Only when we have no form of light do we
realize how helpless we are when the sun sets, or what we can do when the sun
rises. Christians do not exist to live in a high-walled Christians only castle
surrounded by a moat. In that way of thinking, the drawbridge allows them to
control access to the Christian enclave. The outer signs message is clear to
the community around the castle: No Sinners AllowedNo Exceptions! Christians exist to be light in a dark world. They exist to reflect Gods power
and to show the resurrected Jesus Christ in their lives. What they are because
of God and Jesus Christ influences others to find direction in God. Christians
cannot be Gods light which interacts with the darkness of anti-spiritual forces
unless Christians interact with ungodliness. Consider: people generally equate knowledge with light, or commendable moral
values with light, or dangerous times with darkness. Light is a positive
influence; Christians should be a positive influence. Most people fear few things as they fear blindness. The curse of all curses is
to be unable to see. We view living in the dark as a curse. Good spiritual leadership does two things: (1) It guides individuals to light so
they can see for themselves. (2) It helps believers improve their sight. The
goal of spiritual leadership is to guide people to the ability to see, not to
control sightless people. The religious movement surrounding Jesus Christ was unlike other significant
religious movements. Originally, it seemed to be a Jewish reform movement. When
the infant Jesus was presented to God at the Jewish temple, Simeon viewed Jesus
as the fulfillment of Gods promise to Israel (Luke 2:25-35). John the Baptist
was declared to be the fulfillment of the Jewish promise of the coming of Elijah
(Matthew 11:10, 14). Jesus taught and performed miracles primarily for Jewish
people in Galilee and Judea. The first place Peter was recorded going after his
Pentecost presentation in Acts 2 was to the Jewish temple at the hour of prayer
(Acts 3:1). The movement changed when Peter taught the message of the good news to
non-Jewish, non-proselytized people in Acts 10 and baptized them. Even Simeon
said it was Jesus destiny to be a light of revelation to the Gentiles (Luke
2:32). The writer of the Gospel of Matthew (Matthew 4:16) saw Jesus as the
fulfillment of Isaiah 9:2. Paul saw the conversion of gentiles to Jesus Christ
as a means of blessing Israel (Romans 11:1-15). How should we consider this movement when it had more Jewish Christians than
non-Jewish Christians? (There was a huge cultural distinction between Jews and
all non-Jews.) What was the movement when it had more non-Jewish adherents than
Jewish adherents? What was it when it was a peculiar mix of Jewish Christians
and non-Jewish Christians? Christianity has never enjoyed a smooth, all-encompassing transition from
generation to generation, and it never will. It was not divinely designed to be
a mindless subjugation of those who were forced to agree. Instead, it was
divinely designed to be a faith-filled, vibrant lifestyle of those committed to
God. It has never been easy to give a simple definition of Christian commitment. As a
religious movement, Christianitys complexity denotes the complexity of a grace-filled God Who gave His son in human form and saves through death and
resurrection. That salvation is based on a crucified but resurrected person who
produced many martyrs on every level of servicefrom apostle to slave. One of the key moments of transition came when Constantine I legalized
Christianity in the Roman Empire in 313 AD. He is said to have had a Christian
vision prior to his successful battle of the Milvian Bridge. Constantines
victory resulted in the reunification of the Roman Empire under one ruler, with
Christianity becoming the state religion. Suddenly the illegal religious movement without power became the legal religious
movement with access to the states power. Suddenly the religious movement based
on faith in Jesus Christ which motivated martyrdom became the religious movement
in which martyrdom was supposed to be impossible. Suddenly the diverse movement
that defied a singular expression and identity was forced to become a religious
movement with a single expression and a sanctioned theology. Suddenly the
distinction between church and state was blurred. Suddenly a religious movement
that never was involved in physical conflict sanctioned a war on a group who
believed in Jesus Christ but did not agree with the official position of the
church. Now Christian adherents could be (and were) forced to accept views with which
they disagreed. Instead of a faith movement, Christianity transformed itself
into a power organization that required and enforced conformity. Was the good politician Constantine merely a shrewd politician who used an
energetic, durable religious movement to achieve his purposes? Was the
expression of Christianity basically changed as a matter of political pragmatism
rather than faith-filled commitment? How many of todays doctrines are the
result of the political decisions of that moment rather than a devotion to Gods
will? Why discuss all this? For one reason. Those who dare to exercise any level of
leadership in a congregation need to realize that leadership in a congregation
has never been simple, and never will be. The key to effective leadership in the
church is not power, and never has been. In many ways, the faith of commitment
and what we know as power are enemies. To dare to lead in a congregation is to dare to get involved constructively in
conflict. Conflict is an inevitable part of spiritual leadership!
A Hard Observation
The "Uh-Oh" Moment
Major Transition
Why?
Link to a summary of other books by David Chadwell
Link to West-Ark Church of Christ Home Page